In the months since my red-pilling, I have spent a great deal of time considering what it means to be “alt-left”. Normies may assume, like Trump , that the alt-left is simply the apparent opposite of the alt-right, and use it to describe groups like Antifa or Black Block, while some on the left, such as Swiss intellect Heinzi Freinacht,would adopt the term to describe a metamodern turn in leftist thought. The former definition I feel confident in calling a mistake, as it arises simply from the error of taking “alt” to be synonymous with “far” while the latter I find extremely interesting and intend to explore more thoroughly at a later point (I expect it has plenty of common ground with my own views, even if it places itself more squarely in lineage with the left); but the definition of “alt-left” I, for a number of reason, take as my own comes from those who first coined it– bloggers in the orbit of Robert Stark’s Podcast The Stark Truth, namely, Robert Lindsay, Francis Nally, and Brandon Adamson. To these bloggers, the alt-left represents less something separate from the broader alt-right as a niche within it: “The Left of the Alt-Right”, as Brandon Adamson subtitles his website Altleft.com. Yet even with this baseline definition in place, the term is still nebulous, with Lindsay calling himself a “liberal race realist”, and Adamson and Nally each having their own visions.
I ended my last post imagining a Politics as to the Alt-Right as New Wave was to Punk, a politics with a returned emphasis on beauty and creativity to follow a destructive, Dionysian splurge; a politics of renaissance and renewal. This I referred to as the hard-work of recreating, or replacing, the institutions eroded by liberalism.
In broad strokes, what is my vision for this reconstruction?
All hegemonic systems of value have an expiration date, and that of liberal universalism is fast approaching.
For decades the liberal crusade for equality went about deconstructing every institution with which the average person could orient their Identity, calling into question the unstated premises at the heart of these institutions, and highlighting their “myth” character, as well as the inequality masked or “naturalized” by those premises– preferring a “nurture over nature” explanation of every hierarchy existing within society. Its late and final stage– cultural-Marxist, millennial, “SJW”, Identity politics– brings the universalist doctrine into a totalitarianism by extending its egalitarian logic to the fullest extreme, suggesting every inequality is the result of a “social construct”, and vowing to “deconstruct” such inequality wherever it can possibly find it. In doing so it has brought to the West a pandemic crisis of gender, sexual, racial, and national identity, responses to which we should only expect to grow more volatile and polarized.
This is a blog about politics, sexuality, aesthetics, and how they are connected.
It is as personal a blog as it is political– as much a reflection on my identity and its contradictions as a reflection on the state of the West, and its contradictions.